Here is a picture of the newcomer. I never set up a cube and I was just to make one curious, given also the recent trend towards this kind of tanks . Sunday, December 21, 2008
Illegal Work In Bc Without A Work Permit?
Here is a picture of the newcomer. I never set up a cube and I was just to make one curious, given also the recent trend towards this kind of tanks . Tuesday, November 18, 2008
When You Pop Your Cherry Are You Suppose To Bleed
Before you start this little "test" I cropped the Bolbitis clearly, removing all the leaves are too large, leaving space and light to all the smaller ones, to stimulate the formation of a "crown" more homogeneous and compact. A similar pruning has been done under moss, leaving a large but well-established area just to the wood.
Next step was added to the substrate, corresponding to points of greatest need, the capsules of Plant Nutrition +. The next day I added 5ml Plant Nutrition + Liquid (135 on the net), although the recommended dosage was 10 ml/100l. The reason is related to many factors, first of all because I do not know the product and of course the doses are approximate. In second floor, having added the capsules seemed risky to provide additional nutrients in significant amounts. Finally, reading the instructions on the package, the house should start to make the information in smaller doses, incermentando over time, which I particularly liked and apparently confirms the seriousness of the Danish company.
Saturday, August 2, 2008
Pokemon Battlerevolution Rom
Now this blog is also available for mobile phones: simply type on your mobile phone, the following URL:
http://reggianiblog.wirenode.mobi
The download is fast and the pages are read, since they include only the text without pictures.
Mr. Alessandro Reggiani
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Gropping In The Train
I think the art. 190 CCP does not pose any problem of interpretation. Its wording is clear and unambiguous. Yet, even in the face of a standard, whose wording is flawless, has formed a Law of merit to say the least absurd and contradictory. I refer to the Judgement of the Court of Rome on 06 January 2007, which considers unacceptable the filing of the reply, if the same party has not done so before, to the filing of written submissions. Writes The Court: "The defendant is not in fact have never filed a closing statement, so that the filing of the so-called" replica "means that the possibility for the defendant to file its written submissions after the filing of the actress, the which is unacceptable because it affects deeply the logic of the case in art. 190 cpc. The filing of the reply is not is an option that the party can exercise quomodo libet, but it is the instrument of the case - as the same lemma shows - in contrast, replicate, to the adverse allegations. It follows that the filing of the reply is subject to the juris conditio the prior filing of written submissions " .
appears clear to all that the written submissions and the reply are profoundly different: the first is a written document that summarizes all the arguments of defense, both in fact and in law, also based on the issues raised during the investigation stage, the second, however, is limited to the dispute by the opposing arguments in written submissions and, therefore, is premised on the deposit and the closing statement of his opponent.
So, in my opinion, abhorrent and contrary to legislative requirements, the Court of Rome, purely and simply equate the closing statement to the reply, so assuming the possible intent of the lawyer treacherously to file the closing statement after the date provided by art. 190 CPC, in order to prevent the opponent to respond.
E 'clear, however, that where the defender is not only limt to challenge opposing arguments, but discussing issues in their own right, the judge should not consider them in its decision, but can not, for this, considered inadmissible the whole reply.
We hope that this decision, as well as a few other previously pronounced by the Court of Naples and the Court of Termini Imerese be reformed in the following instances.
Mr. Alessandro Reggiani
Sunday, March 2, 2008
Diablo 2 Lod Patch 1.10 Bnclient.dll But I Have
On February 27, 2008 was enacted on December 31, 2007 DL, No 248 (cd Milleproroghe Decree).
So much for simplification of rules! The law is diverse and not only incomprehensible to the ordinary citizen, but also to insiders, because of the continual references to other standards in the most disparate subjects. But the most striking is found in scandal. 36, paragraph 4-ter, which states: "The folder payment under Article 25 of Presidential Decree of 29 September 1973, no 602, as amended, contains, also, on pain of nullity, an indication of the responsible role of the registration procedure in and the issuing and service thereof folder. The provisions in the preceding sentence shall apply to the roles handed over to agents of recovery from 1 June 2008; failing to give the leaders of the proceedings in the folders of payment for roles delivered before that date is not the cause of nullity of the same .
This is a real amnesty for Equitalia, violates the fundamental rights of the citizen and of a typical feudal state. One is really shocked before the hubris and shamelessness of a political class that totally cares for the Constitution and the rule of law.
who wrote and voted on this standard, in fact, deliberately breached the terms established by the Constitutional Court with the Order of 09 November 2007, in which he had expressly stated the requirement that the charge of proceedings in the payment forms. No more! This rule is clearly in contradiction with the Statute of the Taxpayer (L. 212/2000), which enshrines the principle of non-retroactivity of tax laws and the obligation of good faith in relations between taxpayers and tax authorities, as well as with the Law on Transparency of Administrative Acts (L. 241/90), which provides for the nullity of any administrative action of the essential elements missing. This
and Solta one of countless examples of how certain rulers, consider the Italian subjects and not citizens.
Mr. Alessandro Reggiani
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Uchi Cosmetic And Toiletry Bags
In the United States each year are born approximately 50,000 patent litigation. Of these, only 4% of lands to the courtroom. The remaining 96% will be resolved by lawyers, who, after a careful examination of the case and a thorough search of case law, persuade customers to refrain from, or to find a compromise solution, in anticipation of what could be the decision of the court in cases where the cause was rooted.
This shows how extremely important, for the sake of legal certainty and reduce the load of cases, the emergence of a coherent law of legitimacy and properly valued in all instances.
I think that the change proposed in the previous post of 05/02/2008, is a first step in this direction.
Mr. Alessandro Reggiani
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Watching My Father Masterbate
The problem of "legal certainty" is largely dependent on the legislative technique adopted and the development of case.
Too many poorly drawn or incomplete standards, which do not give cognizance to the citizens of their actual rights.
This may give rise to multiple interpretations, leading to the establishment of the disputes which times expand exponentially in subsequent proceedings.
Deficits, both cultural and technical, the legislature must meet the law's legitimacy with interpretive guidelines often conflict with each other.
who sits in parliament should be held to requirements that ensure an adequate knowledge of legal matters and legislative drafting. However, a reform in this sense, difficult to implement if not utopian.
More practical, however, is the ability to improve the accuracy of decisions from the first grade of trial, to give greater importance to that activity and effectiveness of case law that stands as a necessary corrective the incurable deficiencies of the legislature.
Greater legal certainty would be even better chance to predict the outcome of a possible cause. This would result in an increase in the definitions of disputes out of court and a simultaneous reduction of civil litigation.
Such a goal could be achieved through some simple changes to the code of civil procedure, such as those listed below (shown in bold and italics the parts that should be added):
Article 132. Content of the sentence.
The sentence is pronounced in the name of the Italian people and bears the heading: the Italian Republic.
should have:
1) an indication of the court which made the award;
2) the names of the parties and their counsel;
3) the conclusions of the prosecutor and those of the parties;
4) his summary of the actual process and the reasons in fact and in law the decision;
4-bis) the detailed explanation, in a special section of the grounds, reasons in fact and in law, for which it is not considered applicable or not it is considered to share , the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court may be invoked by the parties in their pleadings;
5) the device, the date of the resolution and signing of the court.
The ruling by Judge college is only signed by the President and Judge extender. If the President can not sign on death or other impediment, the sentence is signed by the oldest member of the College, provided that the subscription is first mentioned the obstacle, if the author can not take out the sentence of death or other impediment is sufficient only the signature of the President, provided the subscription is listed in the first impediment.
Article 161. Nullity of the award.
The invalidity of the judgments subject to appeal or further appeal can be claimed only to the limits and rules specific to these facilities appeal.
This provision does not apply when the sentence lacks the signature of the judge.
The lack of a requirement under Article. 132, second paragraph n. 4-a is due to irremediable nullity and must be taken office in each state and grade of the trial .
Mr. Alessandro Reggiani